So, what do the “changes” mean for Sellers?
Honestly, not much! Despite the headlines, there are not many changes here. The main takeaways in point form are:
1/ Separate discussion of listing and buyer broker commissions
2/ “Negotiable” commissions
3/ Placement of offer of compensation
I am happy to elaborate on each of these in more detail.
What “Changes” for Buyers?
The requirement of a buyer representation agreements is a significant departure from how things were previously handled. Here are the main takeaways in point form:
1/ Buyer Representation Agreements are Required
2/ Buyers Prepared to Pay for Realtor Fees Possibly
What I Like, and Don't Like About the Settlement
So far, we have not seen much change as a result of the lawsuit or the settlement. However, it is creating lots of confusion and questions. These changes are extremely unlikely to lower the cost of housing and could make it even more expensive for buyers in some instances.
While there is more transparency for consumers in how agents in their transaction will be paid and by whom, there needs to be more transparency surrounding how much compensation is being offered from other sellers to buyers agents. Currently, this is something we can see in MLS and can relay to clients. Without this information in MLS, it could lead to less understanding for buyers, sellers, and agents of the range of commissions for buyer brokers since it is less transparent to everyone in the process.
The changes professionalizes the real estate industry. Many top agents and teams already operate through buyer representation agreements. I am glad that more buyers will be better represented going forward.
As with any changes, the market and the industry will quickly adjust, and having an agent on your side who is paying attention and has their finger on the pulse of the market is going to position you for success best.